Cases 31 - 40 of 126
COOMES v. ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOT, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv05952
Defendant:
PARK PALAIS LLC, ANN CLARY GORDON, ESQ., SHAPIRO SHER and others
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH COOMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NATIONWIDE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE et al
as 5:2019cv05868
Defendant:
MATTHEW JOSEPH FOLEY and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
Plaintiff:
NATIONWIDE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Mitchell v. Commissioner of Internam Revenue et al
as 3:2019cv02024
Defendant:
Commissioner of Internam Revenue, Michael J. Desmond and Maurice B. Foley
Plaintiff:
Curt P Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
COOMES v. BROWN et al
as 2:2019cv05244
Defendant:
ANN CLARY GORDON, ESQ., SHAPIRO SHER, SHAPIRO SHER GUINOT & SANDLER, P.A. and others
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH COOMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
RAMOS v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL et al
as 2:2019cv03816
Defendant:
HANUSCHAK, JANE DOE 1, HANS and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH RAMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
SAVAGE v. LEDERER et al
as 2:2019cv01114
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DELANEY, LEDERER and others
Plaintiff:
RASHAN-I: SAVAGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAVAGE v. WOELPPER et al
as 2:2019cv01078
Respondent:
JUDGE SCOTT DICLAUDIO, ROONEY, JAREK KRAJEWSKI and others
Petitioner:
RASHAN-I SAVAGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
