Cases 1 - 10 of 209
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Hines v. Foot Locker
as 24-576
Plaintiff:
SHERELL ANN HINES
Defendant:
FOOT LOCKER, INC., SHOE SENCES, MONROE COUNTY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Hines v. Foot Locker et al
as 6:2024cv06060
Plaintiff:
Sherell Ann Hines
Defendant:
Foot Locker, Shoe Sences, Monroe County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024at00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Sones de Mexico Ensemble et al
as 2:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Sones de Mexico Ensemble, The Chain Smokers, Stevie Wonder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fashion Exchange, LLC v. Hybrid Promotions, LLC
as 23-7818
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FASHION EXCHANGE, LLC
Defendant:
JIMMY JAZZ, INC., FOOT LOCKER, INC., FOREVER 21 RETAIL, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
HYBRID PROMOTIONS, LLC, JARROD DOGAN, GAVIN DOGAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
