Cases 1 - 10 of 19
United States of America v. $4,815,369.94
as 1:2022cv04946
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$4,815,369.94, 365 Wellness LLC, 5 Star Nutrition LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. Kia Forte 2022, VIN:3KPF24AD1NE476494
as 4:2022cv00470
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One 2022 Kia Forte, VIN:3KPF24AD1NE476494 and Kia Forte 2022, VIN:3KPF24AD1NE476494
Claimant:
Emma Noelle Salcido
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. 2019 Black Mercedes-Benz 3500XD Crew, VIN: WD4PF4CDXKP155500, et al
as 2:2021cv02189
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
2019 Black Mercedes-Benz 3500XD Crew, VIN: WD4PF4CDXKP155500,, 2017 White Tesla Model X, VIN: 5YJXCAE48HF075775:, 1962 Red/Cream Chevrolet Impala, VIN: 21769K160645 and others
Claimant:
Brant Jolly, James J. Taylor, Jr., Celesta Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Real Property, Including All Improvements Thereon And Appurtenances Thereto, Located at 5004 Thomas Drive, Unit 812, Panama City Beach, Florida et al
as 3:2021cv00188
Defendant:
Real Property, Including All Improvements Thereon And Appurtenances Thereto, Located at 5004 Thomas Drive, Unit 812, Panama City Beach, Florida and Real Property, Including All Improvements Thereon and Appurtenances Thereto, Located at 1036 Fort Pickens Road, Pensacola Beach, Florida
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Eric David Mayes, Brian Keith Moore and Caitlin Elizabeth Mayes
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 983
United States of America v. 1449 S. Highway 6, Sugar Land, Texas
as 4:2021cv00486
Defendant:
1449 S. HIGHWAY 6, SUGAR LAND, TEXAS, 418 W. AUSTIN STREET, FREDERICKSBURG, TEXAS, LOT 10, BLOCK 2, OF THE ESTATES AT LAKES OF WILLIAMS RANCH, SECTION 1, FORT BEND COUNTY, TEXAS, and 420 W. AUSTIN STR
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. Any and All Joint Venture Units of Morgan Interest Holders, et al.
as 1:2020cv00334
Defendant:
Any and All Joint Venture Units of Morgan Interest Holders, et al., 140 Westbrook Hills Drive, Syracuse, New York, 2161 Camelot Drive, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Robert Morgan Limited Partnership III, James Martin, Rocmo 2 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LOT 31, IN BLOCK 9, OF WATERVIEW ESTATES, SECTION 1, A SUBDIVISION IN FORT BEND COUNTY, TEXAS
as 4:2017cv03496
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LOT 31, IN BLOCK 9, OF WATERVIEW ESTATES, SECTION 1, A SUBDIVISION IN FORT BEND COUNTY, TEXAS
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. The Real Property known as 5953 Tarpon Gardens Circle, Unit #102, Cape Coral, Florida et al
as 3:2017cv02762
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
The Real Property known as 5953 Tarpon Gardens Circle, Unit #102, Cape Coral, Florida, The Real Property Known as 6021 Lakehurst Court, Arlington, Texas, The Real Property Known as 817 Baker Street, Fort Worth, Texas and others
Claimant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA , Robert G Hankerson , Patti A Hankerson and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. 2141 Thorndike Avenue, Casper, Wyoming et al
as 1:2016cv00283
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
2141 Thorndike Avenue, Natrona County, Casper, Wyoming and 2001 East Primavera Lane, Mohave County, Fort Mohave, Arizona
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 983
United States of America v. $1,657,375.00 in United States currency et al
as 6:2015cv00686
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$1,657,375.00 in United States currency, $158,761.38 in funds seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank Account No. XXXXX6202, $516,364.31 in funds seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank Account No. XXXXXX372 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
