Cases 51 - 60 of 321
Jones et al v. City of St. Louis, Missouri et al
as 4:2021cv00600
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Lieutenant Sidney Turner, Correctional Officer Unknown Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell Rusan, Derrick Jones and Jerome Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Stephen Fowlkes
as 21-2163
Defendant / Appellant:
Stephen Fowlkes
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Reyes v. Fowlkes et al
as 1:2021cv00061
Defendant:
Utah Department of Natural Resources Parks and Recreation, Mike Fowlks, Mercer Owen and others
Plaintiff:
Freddy Joe Reyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOWLKES v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2021cv07734
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and JONATHAN GRAMP
Petitioner:
BRIAN FOWLKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FOWLKES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv13062
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH FOWLKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stinson v. Fowlkes et al
as 2:2021cv02148
Plaintiff:
Mark Stinson
Defendant:
Joedae L. Jenkins, John T. Fowlkes, Jr., Arthur E. Quinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ladonesty Fowlkes v. Andrew Saul
as 21-1303
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LADONESTY FOWLKES
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv17471
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
JONES v. FORD et al
as 5:2020cv00422
Defendant:
MEDICAL DIRECTOR JOSEPH P FOWLKES, JOHN AND OR JANE DOES, DOCTOR FOGUM and others
Plaintiff:
BRYAN L VIZION JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Ford et al
as 1:2020cv04293
Defendant:
Joseph P. Fowlkes, John & Jane Does, Dr. Fogum and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan L. (Vizion) Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
