Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Escamilla v. Miranda et al
as 5:2023cv05033
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Barajas Escamilla
Defendant:
Lidia Miranda, Michael's Grill & Taqueria Inc. and Jose Francisco Barajas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Barajas v. R&Y Logistic & Delivery Multi Service LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Francisco Barajas
Defendant:
R&Y Logistic & Delivery Multi Service LLC, Ysairreah Santos and Unknown Santos
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
USA v. Francisco Barajas-Oceguera
as 20-50311
Defendant / Appellant:
FRANCISCO JOEL BARAJAS-OCEGUERA, AKA Francisco Barajas, AKA Francisco Barajas Oceguera, AKA Francisco Oceguera, AKA Francisco Oceguera-Barajas
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Francisco Barajas Navarro v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-70601
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO BARAJAS NAVARRO
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Francisco Barajas v. S. Frauenhiem
as 2:2016cv07607
Petitioner:
Francisco Barajas
Respondent:
S. Frauenhiem
Barajas v. Frauenhiem
as 2:2016cv02000
Petitioner:
Francisco Barajas
Respondent:
S. Frauenhiem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Buneta et al v. Fairmont City IL et al
as 3:2016cv00794
Plaintiff:
Cheyenne C Buneta and Terry Buneta
Defendant:
Fairmont City Illinois , Teresa Suarez , Rojas Vega and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barajas v. USA
as 1:2016cv00225
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Francisco Barajas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00457
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Barajas v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 3:2011cv00894
Defendant:
American Servicing Company Inc., BNC Mortgage, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Barajas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
