Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Francisco Ibarguen v. William Barr
as 19-72099
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO GUTIERREZ IBARGUEN
Edwards v. 4JLJ
as 19-40553
Defendant / Appellee:
4JLJ, L.L.C., doing business as J4 Oilfield Services and JOHN JALUFKA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERNESTO FLORES, FRANCISCO GUTIERREZ, RICKY MARTIN and others
USA v. Antonio Gutierrez
as 19-30107
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTONIO FRANCISCO GUTIERREZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Francisco Gutierrez
as 19-50167
Defendant / Appellant:
FRANCISCO GUTIERREZ, AKA Ammo, AKA Bullet
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gutierrez et al v. Valleyview Bldg, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01701
Plaintiff:
Moises Gutierrez, Francisco Gutierrez and Raul Gutierrez
Defendant:
Fadey Cherimnov and Valleyview Bldg, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gutierrez-Mejia v. USA
as 4:2018cv00370
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Juan Francisco Gutierrez-Mejia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Juan Gutierrez-Mejia
as 17-40302
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN FRANCISCO GUTIERREZ-MEJIA, also known as Juan Francisco Ponce Mejia, also known as Erik Elizondo-Rangel, also known as Jose Ponce
Edwards v. 4JLJ, LLC
as 2:2015cv00299
Plaintiff:
Joshua Edwards, Francisco Gutierrez, Humberto J Morales and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Rodrigo Tarango Jr.
Defendant:
4JLJ, LLC doing business as J4 Oilfield Services and John Jalufka
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Gutierrez et al
as 3:2015cv00190
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Defendant:
Francisco Gutierrez, Maria Macedo and DOES 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Earl Brown v. James E Brown and Associates, APC et al
as 2:2014cv08841
Defendant:
Paterno Almendral, Frederick H. Alschuler, Emma Arella and others
Plaintiff:
James Earl Brown
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
