Cases 31 - 40 of 1,955
Franklin v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00804
Petitioner:
Charles L. Franklin
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Franklin
as 23-40665
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Brandon Deonte Franklin
Trackling v. Franklin
as 3:2023cv01578
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Trackling
Defendant:
Unknown Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carson v. Rankin County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv03063
Plaintiff:
Katie Fondren Carson
Defendant:
Rankin County, Mississippi, Bryan Bailey, Amanda Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris v. FCI El Reno
as 4:2023cv00999
Petitioner:
Tom Morris and Tom Franklin Morris
Respondent:
FCI El Reno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gliddon v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2023cv01349
Plaintiff:
James Franklin Gliddon
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Hill v. Franklin Parish Detention Center et al
as 3:2023cv01577
Plaintiff:
Curtis Hill
Defendant:
Franklin Parish Detention Center and Anthony Lemoine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
USA v. Saldivar-Navarro
as 23-50765
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Franklin Johel Saldivar-Navarro, also known as Franklin Zaldivar-Navarro, also known as Franklin Johel Zaldivar, also known as Osman Murillo, also known as Franklin Onasis Navarro, also known as Franklin Saldivar, also known as Franklin Joel Saldivar
USA v. Saldivar-Navarro
as 23-50764
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Franklin Johel Saldivar-Navarro
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
