Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Bennett v. United States of American (sic)
as 3:2022cv00098
Petitioner:
Jonathan Frederick Bennett
Respondent:
United States of American (sic)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cyrus Sanai v. D. Staub, et al
as 19-55427
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER MCINTIRE, an individual, DOES, 1 through 10, inlcusive, D. JOSHUA STAUB, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CYRUS MARK SANAI, an individual
BENNETT v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2018cv06752
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BENNETT
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cyrus Sanai v. D. Joshua Staub et al
as 2:2018cv02136
Defendant:
Frederick Bennett, Does, Christopher McIntire and others
Plaintiff:
Cyrus Sanai
Martensen v. Koch et al
as 3:2014mc00059
Plaintiff:
Kirby Martensen
Defendant:
William Koch and Does 6-25
Movant:
Oxbow Carbon LLC , Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC , Oxbow Carbon & Minerals, International GMBH and others
Bennett v. Paul
as 2:2013cv00068
Petitioner:
Jonathan Frederick Bennett
Respondent:
Scott Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bennett v. Games-Neely et al
as 3:2013cv00131
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Frederick Bennett
Defendant:
Pamela Jean Games-Neely, B. W. Bean and J. D. Schuessler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Barrat et al
as 3:2013cv00128
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Frederick Bennett
Defendant:
Pamela Jean Games - Neely, B. W. Bean, J. D. Schuessler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Games-Neely et al
as 1:2013cv00191
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Frederick Bennett
Defendant:
Pamela Jean Games - Neely, B. W. Bean, J. D. Schuessler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foreman v. Bennett
as 12-1021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenyaitta Benjamin Foreman
Defendant - Appellee:
Frederick Bennett, Staff Attorney Legal Aid Society, Carol Berkman, Judge, New York State Supreme Court Part 71 and Andrew H. Freifeld, Criminal Defense Attorney
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
