Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Liccardi v. Shorr et al
as 3:2021cv02590
Plaintiff:
Serafina Liccardi
Defendant:
Frederick W Smith, Frank McGowen, Jeff Bezos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Drake v. FedEx Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv02636
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
FedEx Corporation, Frederick W. Smith, Molly Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Frederick Smith, Jr. v. Erika Johnson, et al
as 21-2356
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDERICK W. SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
ERIKA JOHNSON, Del. Probation Officer and DETECTIVE JAMES TOBIN, Wilm. Police Dept.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00818
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. DeJoy, et al.
as 1:2021cv02184
Defendant:
Louis DeJoy, Carol B Tome and Frederick W Smith
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lener Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Liccardi v. Smith et al
as 3:2021cv00314
Defendant:
Northwest Research Inc, Frank McGowen, Frederick W Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Serafina Liccardi and Illumination Publication LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Johnson et al
as 1:2020cv01779
Defendant:
Detective James Tobin and Erika Johnson
Plaintiff:
Frederick W. Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Connections CSP, Inc.
as 1:2020cv01696
Plaintiff:
Frederick W. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Connections CSP, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rothman et al v. Snyder
as 8:2020cv03290
Plaintiff:
Frederick W. Smith, Dwight C. Schar and Robert Rothman
Defendant:
Daniel Snyder
Intervenor:
National Football League and WP Company LLC doing business as The Washington Post
Material Witne:
John A. Moag, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyer v. Gill et al
as 2:2020cv00764
Plaintiff:
William Davis Boyer
Defendant:
Shalon Anderson, Cynthia D. Spry, Zachary M. Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
