Cases 61 - 70 of 156
Johnson v. Semple et al
as 3:2018cv01881
Defendant:
Michael Bibens, Collen Gallagher, Omprakash Pellai and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Furey et al
as 3:2018cv01709
Defendant:
Gary Wright, Wright, Richard Furey and others
Plaintiff:
Dashawn Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Surrency v. Cable Wiring Specialist, Inc. et al
as 0:2018cv61718
Defendant:
Decisive Fiber Group, Inc., Cable Wiring Specialist, Inc., Michael W. Furey and others
Plaintiff:
Arioch Shael Surrency
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Manna v. Semple et al
as 3:2018cv00057
Plaintiff:
Joseph Manna
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Richard Furey and Marco Griffen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liberty Natural Products, Inc., et al v. Valerie Hoffman, et al
as 17-36033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LIBERTY NATURAL PRODUCTS, INC. and JAMES R. DIERKING
Defendant - Appellee:
VALERIE HAWK HOFFMAN, AKA Valerie Hawk Furey, AKA Valerie Holland Hawk, AKA Arden Hoffman, AKA Arden Koffman, AKA Allie Loughlin, AKA Ally Loughlin, DAVID BOYD HOFFMAN, AKA David Boyd, AKA David Koffman, SUNRISE HERBAL REMEDIES, INC., dissolved and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Green v. Maldonodo et al
as 3:2017cv00957
Plaintiff:
Courtney Green
Defendant:
Edward Maldonodo, Gary Wright, Johnny Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brelsford v. Breton et al
as 3:2017cv00632
Plaintiff:
Timothy Brelsford
Defendant:
Breton, Riffo, Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Furey v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv10575
Plaintiff:
Dena Marie Furey
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wickner v. Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2017cv00792
Plaintiff:
Lance Wickner
Defendant:
Department of Human Services, Shelby R. Richardson, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
