Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Carter v. Huhn
as 4:2024cv00630
Petitioner:
William Billy G. Carter
Respondent:
Valerie Huhn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Terrence Hammock v. Zowie Barnes
as 24-6375
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE EDWARD HAMMOCK, JR.
Defendant:
DR. ZOWIE BARNES, M.D., DIRECTOR GAIL WATTS, OFFICER J. SHERMAN and others
Carter v Huhn
as 2:2023cv04227
Plaintiff:
William Bill G Carter
Defendant:
Valerie Huhn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Latorre v. Brown et al
as 2:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Jorge Latorre
Defendant:
Brown, Charles Daniels, Calvin Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLAME-BEY v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICE LLC. et al
as 1:2023cv01325
Plaintiff:
YOHAN BIC FLAME-BEY
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICE LLC., JASON G. CARTER, EMRY MCALEAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Huhn et al
as 2:2023cv04142
Plaintiff:
William Billy G Carter
Defendant:
Valerie Huhn, Lee Ann McVay, Mary Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAY v. CARTER
as 1:2023cv00815
Plaintiff:
EDWARD LAY
Defendant:
JASON G. CARTER, JASON G. CARTER, MD and CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, LLP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICE LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00259
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS EVANS
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICE LLC, JASON G CARTER, GILBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Watts et al
as 1:2022cv02630
Plaintiff:
Devin Henderson
Defendant:
Gail Watts, Renard Brooks and G. Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Watts et al
as 1:2022cv02375
Plaintiff:
Mensah Thomas
Defendant:
Director Gail Watts, Sgt. Dupree, Lt. T. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
