Cases 21 - 30 of 101
Johnson v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, et al
as 4:2019cv00107
Plaintiff:
Roderick Sherrod Johnson
Defendant:
G. Parker, M. Alsobrook, Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hallman v. Parker
as 4:2019cv00097
Respondent:
G. Parker
Petitioner:
Robert F Hallman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Johnson v. Davis et al
as 4:2019cv00034
Respondent:
M. Alsobrook, G. Parker, Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and others
Petitioner:
Roderick Sherrod Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PARKER v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv00336
Defendant:
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., ASTRAZENECA LP, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED and others
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II) and PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Plaintiff:
PAULA G. PARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nyce v. Jones et al.
as 2:2019cv00013
Defendant:
Paul M. De Marco, NC Plaza, LLC, Eric G. Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Kinsley F Nyce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2018cv00107
Respondent:
M. ALSOBROOK, G. PARKER, L.E. TOWNSEND and others
Petitioner:
RODERICK SHERROD JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. PARKER et al
as 1:2018cv01603
Respondent:
M. ALSOBROOK, G. PARKER and L.E. TOWNSEND
Petitioner:
RODERICK SHERROD JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CHARLES v. PARKER et al
as 1:2018cv00696
Petitioner:
VERNON LEANDIS CHARLES
Respondent:
G. PARKER, L. E. TOWNSEND, M. ALSOBROOK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2018cv00716
Petitioner:
Maurice G Parker
Respondent:
Arizona, State of and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
