Cases 41 - 50 of 60,062
BRAZILL v. COTTON et al
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
GEORGE BRAZILL
Defendant:
COTTON, VIRGINIA LOCKEY and UNKNOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00772
Plaintiff:
Christopher George Taylor
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Carlton v. Wrozier et al
as 1:2024cv01881
Plaintiff:
Lewis Alan Carlton
Defendant:
KK Wrozier, City of Smyrna GA, Smyrna Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Moore v. David George Hilburn et al
as 4:2024cv01576
Plaintiff:
Denver Kyle Moore
Defendant:
David George Hilburn, Anjelica Harris, E. R. Turnbull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George DeGraw v. Range View Management LLC
as 8:2024cv00908
Plaintiff:
George DeGraw
Defendant:
Range View Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Botelho et al v. Indian Harbor Insurance Company
as 9:2024cv80530
Plaintiff:
George Botelho and Inna Botelho
Defendant:
Indian Harbor Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
McGhee v. Fitch
as 3:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
George Lee McGhee
Defendant:
Lynn Fitch
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
