Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 20
USA v. George Oliver
as 10-13943
Plaintiff - Appellee: USA
Defendant - Appellant: GEORGE OLIVER
OLIVER v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2010cv00660
Plaintiff: George Oliver
Defendant: Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLIVER v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2010cv00115
Plaintiff: GEORGE OLIVER
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
E-Terra, LLC v. SARS Corporation et al
as 3:2008cv00123
Plaintiff: George Oliver Dunham
Defendant: Bill Grill , John McKenzie , Kathy Fry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Morgan v. Moriarty, et al
as 9:2009cv00175
Plaintiff: Leslie Morgan
Defendant: John Moriarty, Jacqueline J. Sanders, Chana Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-3829
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-6046
Amicus Curiae: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
James Holt v. State of Ohio, et al
as 08-3181
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES E. HOLT
Defendant: STATE OF OHIO, et al.
Defendant - Appellee: OHIO DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH SERVICES, GARY MOHR, BARRY BRAVERMAN and others
Type: Labor Labor: Other
GACH et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv67751
Plaintiff: PAUL GACH, PAUL GACH, ANTOINETTE GACH and others
Defendant: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, CELOTEX CORPORATION, GAF CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Oliver v. United States of America
as 1:2004cv02554
Petitioner: George Oliver
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?