Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Gerald Hopper v. Garry McFadden
as 24-6050
Plaintiff:
GERALD DAMONE HOPPER
Defendant:
GARRY L. MCFADDEN, Sheriff, Mecklenburg County, In his official capacity, MARY LEBLISS, Medical Doctor, Mecklenburg County Jail, in her individual capacity, DESTINY WALTERS, Physician Assistant, Mecklenburg County Jail, in her individual capacity and others
Hopper v. USA
as 3:2023cv00377
Petitioner:
Gerald Damone Hopper
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
US v. Gerald Hopper
as 23-6684
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GERALD DAMONE HOPPER
Gerald Hopper v. William Salazar
as 23-1050
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERALD DAMONE HOPPER
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM SALAZAR
Hopper v. McFadden et al
as 3:2022cv00454
Plaintiff:
Gerald Damone Hopper
Defendant:
Gary McFadden, FNU LeBliss, Wellpath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gerald Hopper v. William Salazar
as 22-1284
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERALD DAMONE HOPPER
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM SALAZAR, CMPD Police Officer
Defendant:
TIM SIELAFF, Assistant District Attorney, MELODIE PELLOT-HERNANDEZ, Assistant District Attorney and FNU HUNTER, Assistant District Attorney, in official capacity
Hopper v. Salazar et al
as 3:2021cv00636
Plaintiff:
Gerald Damone Hopper
Defendant:
William Salazar, Tim Sielaff, Melodie Pellot-Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopper v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2018cv01223
Plaintiff:
Gerald Damone Hopper
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, SE Regional Office and FCI Estill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopper v. Session et al
as 5:2018cv01147
Plaintiff:
Gerald Damone Hopper
Defendant:
Jefferson B Session, III, Mark S Inch, Ian Connors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
