Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,019
Gill v. Wescott et al
as 2:2024cv00081
Plaintiff: Michael Todd Gill
Defendant: NFN Wescott, NFN Mendoza and NFN Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Chronister et al
as 8:2024cv00993
Plaintiff: David Lee White
Defendant: Chad Chronister, Valdez M. Nelson Guzman, S. Colin Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raymond Gill v. Jennifer Broton, et al
as 24-11236
Plaintiff: RAYMOND EDWARD GILL
Defendant: JENNIFER A. BROTON, AVERY, B. PAVIGLIQNTI and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01188
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robert Bostic v. Sumter County Police Department
as 24-6351
Plaintiff: ROBERT LAWRENCE BOSTIC
Defendant: CITY OF SUMTER COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, JESSICA HATCHLEY, HEATH L. GARDNER and others
(PC) Smith v. Uzma et al
as 2:2024cv00683
Plaintiff: Donald Joshua Smith
Defendant: Chaudhry Uzma, Gena Jones, Gill Amandeep and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill v. Broton et al
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff: Raymond Edward Gill
Defendant: Warden Jennifer A. Broton, Assistant Warden Avery, B. Pavigliqnti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
(PC) Jackson v. Rivera et al
as 1:2024cv00261
Plaintiff: Cornel Jackson
Defendant: Rivera, Schmalls, Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill v. USA - 2255
as 1:2024cv00622
Petitioner: Raymond Edward Gill
Respondent: USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Binns v. Coles et al
as 2:2024cv00128
Plaintiff: Gregory Binns
Defendant: SGT. Coles, LT. Riggsby, K9 Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?