Cases 21 - 30 of 1,020
Gill v. USA - 2255
as 1:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Raymond Edward Gill
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cousins v. Young et al
as 7:2023cv00746
Plaintiff:
Eugene Ross Cousins
Defendant:
Col. Eric Young, Sgt. Caplinger, Officer O. Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Moody et al
as 2:2023cv01013
Plaintiff:
Donald Perry and Mosheh Ben Israel
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Ricky Dixion, Mercado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill, Charles v. Miller, Scott
as 3:2023cv00739
Plaintiff:
Charles B. Gill, Sr.
Defendant:
Scott Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughan v. Thomas et al
as 2:2023cv02671
Plaintiff:
Beau Cameron Vaughan
Defendant:
Mary Thomas, Mr. Byrd, Mr. West and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bertolo (PS) v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv02763
Defendant:
Sean Burrows, Dean Williams, Andre Moses Stancil and others
Plaintiff:
James M. Bertolo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GILL v. FAYETTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. (FCSD) et al
as 1:2023cv01766
Plaintiff:
JORDAN MATTHEW GILL
Defendant:
FAYETTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. (FCSD), CONNERSVILLE POLICE DEPT. (CPD), CLINT BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raymond Gill v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 23-13117
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAYMOND EDWARD GILL
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - MEDIUM
Raymond Gill v. FCC Coleman Warden, et al
as 23-12717
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND EDWARD GILL and ERIC BRYANT
Defendant / Appellee:
FCC COLEMAN WARDEN, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and PRISON CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, FCC COLEMAN
Gill v. Alexander
as 23-10843
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rudolfo Gill
Defendant / Appellee:
Wade Alexander, Jordan Unit Assistant Warden, Antonious Flanagan, Captain, Carlos Mendoza, Lieutenant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
