Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Edwards v. Gilley
as 3:2026cv01314
Petitioner:
Jay William Edwards
Respondent:
Warden John Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Al-Hanbalee v. Gilley et al
as 7:2026cv00696
Plaintiff:
Sabur Mahee Ibn Venable Al-Hanbalee
Defendant:
Warden Mr. Gilley, Mr. Rutherfurd, Mr. Lawrenz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Griss v. FBOP et al
as 6:2026cv00241
Plaintiff:
Sean Griss
Defendant:
FBOP, USP McCreary, Warden Gilley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gilley v. Bisignano, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2026cv01176
Plaintiff:
Jessica Gilley
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Mendoza v. Gilley Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv00220
Plaintiff:
Luis Mendoza
Defendant:
Gilley Construction, Inc., John Doe Person(s) 1-5, John Doe Entity(ies) 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Strader v. City Confidential, et al
as 26-3162
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. STRADER
Defendant:
CITY CONFIDENTIAL, A&E NETWORK, (FNU) (LNU) (1) and others
Jeffrey Mitchell v. Lt. Cooke
as 26-6795
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY JAMEL MITCHELL
Defendant:
LT. COOKE, OFFICER MUNCY, OFFICER RYAN EDWARDS and others
McLeod v. United States of America et al
as 7:2026cv00600
Plaintiff:
Joseph McLeod
Defendant:
United States of America, Officer May, J. Gilley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Terry Ofori v. C. Long
as 26-6777
Plaintiff:
TERRY K. OFORI
Defendant:
C. LONG, M. D. POWERS, MR. RUTLEDGE and others
Randy Lassiter, Jr. v. Correctional Officer Blevins
as 26-6757
Plaintiff:
RANDY LEE LASSITER, JR.
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BLEVINS, NURSE CRYSTAL GILLEY, "Pill Call Nurse", LIEUTENANT COLEMAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.