Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Anderson v. Virtue Recovery Center et al
as 6:2023cv00886
Plaintiff:
Michael Anderson
Defendant:
Virtue Recovery Center, Ms. FNU Jaquez, Dr. Rajesh Harripersad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Dabur International Ltd. et al
as 1:2023cv08912
Plaintiff:
Gina Smith
Defendant:
Dabur International Ltd., Dabur International USA Ltd., Dermoviva Skin Essentials, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv04965
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
SMITH v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv00639
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
GINA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. QuikTrip Corporation
as 3:2019cv02521
Defendant:
QuikTrip Corporation
Plaintiff:
Gina Smith
Not Yet Classified:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gebel et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv00820
Plaintiff:
Alice Pollman, Joyce Cox, Vanessa Brown and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-20, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Flagstar Bank, FSB
as 3:2018cv05131
Plaintiff:
Lowell Smith, Gina Smith and William Kivett
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank, FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
