Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Arroyo v. Doe et al
as 2:2022cv00479
Plaintiff:
Amos Arroyo
Defendant:
John Doe, John Backaraff, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2019cv00830
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Johnson
Defendant:
Geoffrey Thompson, James LeBlanc and Gregg Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv00024
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Johnson
Defendant:
Dept of Corrections, Gregg Smith, Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2017cv01431
Defendant:
James M LeBlanc, John Bel Edwards, Gregg Smith and others
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al. v. Dayton et al.
as 0:2017cv00880
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson, Similarly Situated Prisoner's at All Minnesota Correctional Facilities and Other similarly Situated Prisoner's At Rush City Correctional Facility
Defendant:
Mark Dayton, Tina Smith, Tom Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. WVDOC et al
as 3:2016cv00107
Plaintiff:
Gregg Smith
Defendant:
WVDOC, James Rubenstein, Patrick Mirandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Dayton et al
as 0:2015cv04429
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson
Defendant:
Mark Dayton , Tina Smith , Tom Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v. Smith et al
as 3:2011cv00584
Petitioner:
Timothy R. Knox
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Gregg Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
St Pierre v. Brooks et al
as 3:2007cv00530
Defendant:
Debra Brooks, Cheryl Burson, Robert Chambliss and others
Plaintiff:
David E. St. Pierre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Frank et al
as 2:2007cv00631
Plaintiff:
Eddie Gene Evans
Defendant:
Matthew J Frank, John Doe, Marilyn Zurbuchen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
