Cases 1 - 10 of 14
MILLER v. ARMANDO et al
as 2:2023cv04007
Plaintiff:
LACHELLE MILLER
Defendant:
ANTHONY ARMANDO, KELVIN L. TAYLOR and GREYHOUND BUS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Gary Easley v. State of California, et al
as 21-15702
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD J. TRUMP, PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, County of Santa Clara, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY D. EASLEY
Easley v. State of California, et al
as 5:2021cv00893
Defendant:
Greyhound Bus Company, Donald Trump, Katarina Pena and others
Plaintiff:
Gary D Easley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shaffer et al v. Hester et al
as 3:2020cv00735
Plaintiff:
Anthony R Shaffer, Sr. and Doris Ann Shaffer
Defendant:
XYZ Insurance Company, Greyhound Lines Inc., James R Hester and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Greyhound Bus Company et al
as 5:2014cv00471
Respondent:
Greyhound Bus Company and San Antonio Police Department
Petitioner:
Sammie Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
William ReVoal, II v. Jay Nixon, et al
as 12-1983
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William R. ReVoal, II
Defendant - Appellee:
Jay Nixon, Govenor, Greyhound Bus Company, Daniel Leach, Pres./CEO of Greyhound and others
ReVoal v. Nixon et al
as 4:2012cv00438
Plaintiff:
William R ReVoal, II
Defendant:
Jay Nixon, Greyhound Bus Company, David Leach and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jean-Louis v. Greyhound Bus Company et al
as 1:2011cv00120
Defendant:
Greyhound Bus Company
Plaintiff:
Helen Francisca Jean-Louis
The Real Name Is Being Unknown:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Thomas v. Greyhound Bus Company
as 3:2010cv02573
Plaintiff:
Theodore Thomas
Defendant:
Greyhound Bus Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
