Cases 1 - 10 of 7,161
Martin v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02271
Plaintiff:
Guy M Martin
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re: Gerald Brummell
as 24-11448
Petitioner:
In re: GERALD GUY BRUMMELL
Respondent:
ROMY LERNER, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03677
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Johnson v. National Interstate Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv02192
Plaintiff:
Guy Johnson
Defendant:
National Interstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Max Delphin v. Armand
as 1:2024cv03396
Other:
Guy-max delphin
Defendant:
Jacques Junior Armand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lb Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Lliguicota v. Greenwich Diamond Nails & Spa Inc et al
as 1:2024cv03291
Defendant:
Gui Biao Qi, Elaine Bao, Greenwich Diamond Nails & Spa Inc doing business as Diamond Nail & Spa and others
Plaintiff:
Maria Olga Lliguicota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Enforcement of Judgment
DAVIS v. ANGULO et al
as 2:2024cv05774
Plaintiff:
RUSKIN DAVIS
Defendant:
DAVID ANGULO, ARMANDO ANIDO, STEVEN C GILMAN and others
Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Five Guys Properties, LLC
as 2:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Analytical Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Five Guys Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Guy v. City of Corpus Christi et al
as 2:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Walter Kevin Guy
Defendant:
City of Corpus Christi, Julianna Siracusa Rivera, Matthew Manning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
