Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lozada-Manzano, et al v. US
as 21-1276
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CESAR LOZADA, BELKIS MANZANO and GABIEL LOZADA-MANZANO
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Watts v. Middlebrooks et al
as 5:2020cv00036
Defendant:
Warden Gabiel Walker, Captain Unknown Brown and Warden Scott Middlebrooks
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Albert James Watts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watts v. Middlebrooks et al
as 5:2019cv00107
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Albert James Watts
Defendant:
Warden Scott Middlebrooks and Gabiel Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lozada-Manzano et al v. Unites States of America
as 3:2015cv02601
Plaintiff:
Gabiel Lozada-Manzano , Cesar Lozada and Belkis Manzano
Defendant:
Unites States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lozada-Manzano et al v. FBI Agent #1 et al
as 3:2015cv01182
Plaintiff:
Gabiel Lozada-Manzano , Cesar Lozada and Belkis Manzano
Defendant:
FBI Agent #1, FBI Agents Supervisors, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Katie Kindl v. City of Berkley, et al
as 13-2234
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KATIE KINDL
Defendant:
CITY OF BERKLEY, BERKLEY PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT, CITY OF BERKLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Defendant - Appellant:
KENT HERRIMAN and MOSCHELLI
Kindl v. Berkley, City of et al
as 2:2012cv13410
Plaintiff:
Katie Kindl
Defendant:
Berkley, City of , City of Berkley Department of Public Safety , City of Berkley Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Head et al
as 9:2009cv00119
Plaintiff:
Donald Smith
Defendant:
Gail Head, Dennis McElory, Doirs Bartletts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spahr v. Social Security Commissioner et al
as 5:2007cv00880
Plaintiff:
Marcia Spahr
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner, Millers, Spahrs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
