Cases 1 - 10 of 111
Scott v. Ackerman et al
as 1:2022cv00373
Plaintiff:
Gail Scott
Defendant:
Steve Ackerman, Ryan Coogler, Joe Ryan Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Scott v. Martine Arents IM Investments LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Gail Scott
Defendant:
Martine Arents IM Investments LLC, DHI MortgageCompany Carolyn Bertelson, Ocwen Loan Servicing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Scott v. Arents et al
as 1:2021cv00995
Plaintiff:
Gail Scott
Defendant:
Martine Arents, IM Investments LLC, DHI Mortgage Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Prudential Insurance Company of America v. LaCour
as 2:2019cv14791
Defendant:
Gregory Scott, Bretagne Lacour, Leo Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Scott v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv14979
Plaintiff:
Gail Scott
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Arents et al
as 1:2016cv01205
Plaintiff:
Gail Scott
Defendant:
Martin Arents, DHI and Deutsch Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
SCOTT et al v. SAVASENIORCARE, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00658
Defendant:
SAVASENIORCARE, LLC and SSC ASHEBORO OPERATING COMPANY, LLC
Plaintiff:
JOHN WAYNE HOGAN and BRENDA GAIL SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Scott v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv27024
Plaintiff:
Wilene Gail Scott
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Tissue Science Laboratories Limited, Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv07012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Acorlor v. Scott
as 1:2012cv01370
Plaintiff:
Bernard Acorlor
Defendant:
Gail Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
