Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Broncho Bill v. Kijakazi
as 8:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
Gale Anthony Broncho Bill, II
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Bernbeck et al v. Gale
as 4:2018cv03073
Plaintiff:
Kent Bernbeck and Michael Warner
Defendant:
John A. Gale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Krist et al v. Gale
as 8:2018cv00039
Plaintiff:
Christopher Abbott, Albert T. Davis, Dorothy C. Davis and others
Defendant:
John A. Gale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv03133
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strawder v. State of Nebraska et al
as 4:2016cv03161
Defendant:
Scott R. Frakes, Secretary of State John Gale, Neb Attorney Gen Douglas J. Peterson and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Duane Strawder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Community Development Resources v. Adams et al
as 4:2015mc03002
Defendant:
Dennis Leroy Adams and Gale A Adams
Plaintiff:
Community Development Resources
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Clark v. State of Nebraska et al
as 4:2014cv03192
Defendant:
Steven Burns, Jeff Chevron, Troy Hawks and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gember v. City of Lincoln et al
as 4:2014cv03002
Defendant:
City of Lincoln, Lincoln Police Department and Trafcon
Plaintiff:
Gale K. Gember
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Booth v. Pokorny
as 4:2013cv03146
Plaintiff:
Dominique De'Sean Booth
Defendant:
Gale Pokorny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernbeck v. Gale et al
as 8:2013cv00228
Plaintiff:
Kent Bernbeck
Defendant:
John A. Gale and Charlotte TeBrink
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
