Cases 11 - 20 of 76
Richland Central Traffic Court v. Garcia
as 3:2022cv03405
Plaintiff:
Richland Central Traffic Court
Defendant:
Jerome Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jerome Garcia v. A. Enzor
as 22-1924
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME GARCIA
Defendant / Appellee:
A. K. ENZOR, State Trooper and WILLIE MCCAULEY, JR., SC Trooper
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Garcia v. US Postal Service
as 1:2022cv01111
Plaintiff:
Troy Garcia
Defendant:
US Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Trejo v. Howard County, Maryland et al
as 8:2022cv01066
Plaintiff:
William Garcia Trejo
Defendant:
Howard County, Maryland, County Exec. Calvin Ball, III, Director Jack Kavanagh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Housing Opportunities Made Equal of Virginia, Inc. et al v. Everett
as 3:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
Housing Opportunities Made Equal of Virginia, Inc. and Chastity Katelin Garcia
Defendant:
Lawrence White Everett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Garcia v. Childs et al
as 3:2021cv04066
Plaintiff:
Jerome Garcia
Defendant:
Michelle Childs and Shiva Hodges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. SCHEWEL et al
as 1:2021cv00708
Plaintiff:
DERRICK M. ALLEN, SR.
Defendant:
STEVE SCHEWEL, THE CITY OF DURHAM, WANDA PAGE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01807
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
