Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 116
Ash v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2021cv01143
Defendant: State of Minnesota, Lee Ann Gargano, Hibbing Police Department and others
Plaintiff: Davenell L Ash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Asaro et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2020cv10460
Plaintiff: Paulette Hasson, Lee Gargano, Barbara Duffy and others
Defendant: Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04780
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv07775
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
GARGANO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as FLN/8:20-CV-89196
Plaintiff: GARGANO
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
GARGANO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv89196
Defendant: 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: GREGORY JAMES GARGANO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Max Luc Taxi, Inc. et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2017cv10316
Plaintiff: Max Luc Taxi, Inc, Max Luc Taxi, Inc., Tiger Taxi, Inc. and others
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Interested Party: Anoush Cab, Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Judge Jennifer C. Boal
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Gargano vs Town of Barnstable et al
as 1:2020cv10045
Defendant: Mark Delaney, Mathew Sonnabend, Corey Frederickson and others
Plaintiff: Paul A. Gargano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tenemaza v.Eagle Masonry Corp. et al
as 1:2020cv00452
Defendant: Vito Gargano and Eagle Masonry Corp.
Plaintiff: Segundo Francisco Tenemaza
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Vanterpool v. Harris et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00140
Defendant: Papoosha, Tardif, John Aldi and others
Plaintiff: Travis Vanterpool
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?