Cases 1 - 10 of 455
Moore *RESTRICTED FILER* v. Monroe County Detention Facility et al
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Garry Lee Moore *RESTRICTED FILER*
Defendant:
Monroe County Detention Facility, Monroe County, MS, Board of Supervisors, Kevon Crook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. McFadden et al
as 3:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Michael V. Walker
Defendant:
Garry L. McFadden and Mecklenburg County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
La Ronde-Bey v. Chica et al
as 3:2024cv00689
Plaintiff:
Noble Lester Keith La Ronde-Bey
Defendant:
Michael Chica, Rich P. White, Tyler Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ROSEMOND v. WASHINGTON et al
as 1:2024cv00927
Plaintiff:
GARRY ROSEMOND
Defendant:
PAMELA B. WASHINGTON and KIMBERLY SMITH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Deandre Arnold v. Hillsborough County Sheriff, et al
as 24-10634
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE ARNOLD
Defendant:
CHAD CHRONISTER, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SHERIFF, ADRIEL GONZALES and others
Arnold v. Chronister et al
as 8:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Deandre Arnold
Defendant:
Sheriff Chad Chronister, Deputy Adriel Gonzales, Deputy Baez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Arnold et al
as 5:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
James F. Lewis
Defendant:
Bradley Arnold, Randy Mask, Oren Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dees et al v. Zurlo et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lynn Dees and Ethan Davis Smith
Defendant:
Michael Zurlo, Jeffrey R. Brown, Jillian Knox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
