Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Patterson v. GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv19225
Plaintiff:
Gary Patterson
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC and GlaxoSmithKline PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PATTERSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22155
Plaintiff:
GARY PATTERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Patterson v. Gibbs et al
as 6:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
Gary Patterson
Defendant:
Casey Gibbs, M. Carroll, Joseph Pruitt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Patterson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03365
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gary Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PATTERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv59646
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GARY PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00251
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Daniel Vargas v. Amber Howell, et al
as 18-15513
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL VARGAS
Defendant - Appellee:
AMBER HOWELL, STEVE MCBRIDE, RICHARD GLOECKNER and others
Monster Energy Company v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", The
as 1:2017cv06327
Plaintiff:
Monster Energy Company
Defendant:
Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", The, Zhao Fei, Yu Da and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Bankhead v. Bonesteel et al
as 0:2017cv02989
Plaintiff:
Calvin Bankhead
Defendant:
Paul Bonesteel, Columbia Heights Police Department, Gary Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATTERSON v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv00567
Plaintiff:
GARY PATTERSON
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
