Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Smith v. Anderson et al
as 5:2024cv00584
Plaintiff:
Gene Smith
Defendant:
Cherokee County Detention Center, Steve Mueller, Major Steven Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Smith v. Lumpkin
as 23-50231
Petitioner / Appellant:
Ronny Gene Smith
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Smith v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00156
Petitioner:
Ronny Gene Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00340
Petitioner:
Ronny Gene Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mozee v. Keesee et al
as 2:2021cv00092
Defendant:
Clinton Kean, Floyd K Keesee, Joe Tovar and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Mozee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Anderson et al
as 2:2020cv00236
Plaintiff:
Deondray Mason and Deondray Raymond Mason
Defendant:
Brian Janow, Joe Tovar, Daniel Pacheco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Butler et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00667
Plaintiff:
Bobby Gene Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Kay Ivey and Reosha Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Serratt v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00625
Plaintiff:
Bobby Gene Smith, Jr., Jonathan Yancy, Roy Murphy Rutledge and others
Defendant:
Warden Butler, Kay Ivey, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Davis et al
as 6:2019cv00636
Defendant:
Dr. Marcus Hinkle, Tammy Bracewell, Director, TDCJ Lorie Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Ronny Gene Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Davis et al
as 6:2018cv00292
Defendant:
Shelly Strimple, Director, TDCJ Lorie Davis and Stephanie Newell
Plaintiff:
Ronny Gene Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
