Cases 1 - 10 of 19
McClain v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2019cv12722
Plaintiff:
Crystal McClain
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Interested Party:
Geoffrey N Fieger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Jones v. Oakland County Government et al
as 2:2018cv11739
Plaintiff:
Bryan Jones
Defendant:
Oakland County Government, Royal Oak, City of, Southfield, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Oakland County Government et al
as 1:2018cv00555
Plaintiff:
Bryan Jones
Defendant:
Oakland County Government, Royal Oak, City of, Southfield, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv11375
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv12303
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv14265
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv13986
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jeffrey Moldowan v. City of Warren, et al
as 13-1361
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JEFFREY MICHAEL MOLDOWAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF WARREN, COUNTY OF MACOMB, ERIC SMITH, Macomb County Prosecutor and others
Defendant:
CITY OF WARREN POLICE DEPARTMENT, ALAN WARNICK, DONALD INGLES and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
GEOFFREY N. FIEGER
Fieger v. Supreme Court of South Carolina et al
as 3:2010cv01038
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey N Fieger
Defendant:
Supreme Court of South Carolina, Jean H Toal and John W Kittredge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA et al
as 2:2009cv00401
Plaintiff:
THE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, GEOFFREY N. FIEGER, LORI SLIDER and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
