Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 23-10693
Petitioner / Appellant: George Ray Davis
Respondent / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
George Davis, III v. John Woodson
as 22-6543
Petitioner / Appellant: GEORGE W. DAVIS, III
Respondent / Appellee: JOHN A. WOODSON, Warden
Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00303
Petitioner: George Ray Davis
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Woodson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00188
Petitioner: George Washington Davis, III
Respondent: John A. Woodson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00060
Petitioner: George Ray Davis
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2021cv00809
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner: George Ray Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis Bey v. Woodson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00973
Petitioner: George W. Davis Bey
Respondent: John A. Woodson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis-Bey v. Commonwealth of Virginia We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00673
Defendant: Commonwealth of Virginia
Plaintiff: George W. Davis Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Green et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2019cv00770
Plaintiff: George Washington Davis, III
Defendant: Daniel R. Quarles and Nathan Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Hamilton County Jail et al (PLR1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00486
Plaintiff: George Thomas Davis
Defendant: Hamilton County Jail, Hamilton County Officers, Ms Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?