Cases 21 - 30 of 291
Powell v. Barraza
as 3:2022cv01985
Petitioner:
George Edward Powell
Respondent:
Warden Barraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Frosch v. Cowan et al
as 1:2022cv00169
Plaintiff:
George Edward Frosch
Defendant:
Jeff Cowan, John Doe #1 1:22-cv-169, Taylor County Sheriffs Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RILEY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22168
Plaintiff:
GEORGE EDWARD RILEY, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Frosch v. Taylor County DAs et al
as 1:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
George Edward Frosch
Defendant:
Taylor County DAs, Taylor County Judges and Taylor County Court Appointed Attorneys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KELLEY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16444
Plaintiff:
GEORGE EDWARD KELLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GARNER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07470
Plaintiff:
GEORGE EDWARD GARNER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sisk v. MDC Brooklyn et al
as 1:2022cv02367
Plaintiff:
George Edward Sisk
Defendant:
MDC Brooklyn, Restrepo and Student Aid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
George McDermott v. Alan McCarthy
as 22-1405
Plaintiff:
VINCENT S. SAMMONS
Intervenor:
GEORGE EDWARD MCDERMOTT and GEORGE E. MCDERMOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
ALAN J. MCCARTHY, ALFRED C. WEIN, JR., JENNIFER R. LYALL and others
Purdy v. Director et al
as 3:2022cv00733
Plaintiff:
George Edward Purdy
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID Director, Linda Thomas and Betty Milligan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Purdy v. Director et al
as 4:2022cv00264
Plaintiff:
George Edward Purdy
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID Director, Linda Thomas, Betty Milligan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
