Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Hernandez v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2023cv02351
Plaintiff:
Richard Hernandez
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Paul Penzone, George Lester and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
HARRIS v. CLARK et al
as 1:2017cv00143
Petitioner:
GEORGE LESTER HARRIS
Respondent:
MICHAEL CLARK, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Weaver et al v. Fresenius Medical Care North America, Inc. et al
as MOE/4:14-cv-00959
Defendant:
Fresenius USA, Inc. , Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Fresenius Medical Care North America , Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Weaver , Flora Jeter , Ralph Alcala and others
Weaver et al v. Fresenius Medical Care North America, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00959
Defendant:
Fresenius USA, Inc. , Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. , Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Weaver , Flora Jeter , Ralph Alcala and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Martinez v. World Wide Financial Service LLC et al
as 3:2013cv04063
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Martinez
Defendant:
World Wide Financial Service LLC and George Lester
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv03783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00229
In_re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Objector:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested_party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 0110
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
