Cases 31 - 40 of 339
HOWARD v. GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2022cv02902
Plaintiff:
JES'TERIEUZ J. HOWARD and JES'TERIEUZ HOWARD
Defendant:
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES, ALISON HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00183
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02795
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Saada v. Golan
as 22-1966
Petitioner:
Isacco Jacky Saada
Respondent:
Narkis Aliza Golan
Amicus Curiae:
Sanctuary for Families, Inc., Battered Mothers Custody Conference, Georgetown Law Domestic Violence Clinic and others
Rushing v. George Washington University Hospital
as 1:2022cv07707
Plaintiff:
Shaun Akindo Alexande Rushing
Defendant:
George Washington University Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BAI et al v. New York city Regional Center, LLC
as 1:2022cv07378
Plaintiff:
WEN BAI, George Washington Bridge Bus Station and Infrastructure Development Fund, LLC and GEORGE WASHINGTON BRIDGE BUS STATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT FUND, PHASE II, LLC
Defendant:
New York city Regional Center, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ss Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Bozarth v. Katschke et al
as 2:2022cv01265
Plaintiff:
Eddie Ray George Washington Bozarth
Defendant:
Franklin Katschke, Meadow Valley Justice Court, Mike Cowley and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
