Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Lee v. The National Flood Insurance Program et al
as 1:2019cv00147
Plaintiff:
Gerald Lee
Defendant:
The National Flood Insurance Program, Brock Long and Kirstjen Nielson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4001
Lee v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2017cv00038
Plaintiff:
Gerald Lee
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
USA v. Gerald Vergott
as 15-50814
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GERALD LEE VERGOTT, also known as Jerry Vergott, also known as Blacky, also known as Gerald L. Vergott, also known as Gerald Vergott
Mangum v. Warnock et al
as 3:2014cv00575
Plaintiff:
Gerald Lee Mangum
Defendant:
Shannon Warnock, Bobbie Thomas, Clarence Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moen et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc et al
as 6:2014cv01573
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Lee Moen and Lynn Moen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Gerald Thoma
as 13-51179
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GERALD THOMAS, also known as Gerald Lee Thomas, also known as Jerry Thomas
West v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2013cv02685
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Lee West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mangum v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2012cv00527
Plaintiff:
Gerald Lee Mangum
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gerald Kyle v. Circus Circus Mississippi, Inc
as 10-60571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD LEE KYLE
Defendant - Appellee:
CIRCUS CIRCUS MISSISSIPPI, INCORPORATED, doing business as Gold Strike Casino Resort
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
