Cases 1 - 10 of 499
Pierce v. Kobach, et al
as 24-3048
Plaintiff:
MOREHEI PIERCE
Defendant:
KRIS KOBACH, MARK DUPREE, TRAVIS GETTY and others
Paulo v. Agence France Presse
as 24-303
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LEONG FRANCISCO PAULO
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1-100 and XYZ CORPORATION 1-100
Defendant / Appellant:
AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE, GETTY IMAGES (U.S.), INC. and GETTY IMAGES INC.
USA v. Kaleb Gettis
as 24-10282
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KALEB L. GETTIS
Pierce v. Kobach et al
as 5:2024cv04010
Plaintiff:
Morehei Pierce, Christopher Pierce and Morehei Kareem Pierce
Defendant:
Kris Kobach, Mark Dupree, Travis Getty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Kee v. The Detroit Lions, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Allen Kee
Defendant:
The Detroit Lions, Inc., Getty Images (US), INC.,, NFL Properties, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Johnson v. Chapin, et al
as 24-1010
Plaintiff:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant:
DAVID CHAPIN, JESSICA AGGSON, FNU STEIN, Lt. and others
Bey et al v. Landon et al
as 8:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Bolden Bey and Leonie Bolden Bey
Defendant:
Bill Landon, Stanley C. Middleman, Jefferey B. Lown, II and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Getty v. National Oil Corporation Libya Honeywell
as 1:2023cv11190
Plaintiff:
Jomode Elie Getty
Defendant:
National Oil Corporation Libya Honeywell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson (PS) v. Chapin et al
as 1:2023cv03325
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
David Chapin, Jessica Aggson, FNU Stein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennis Clark v. Rap-Up, LLC
as 2:2023cv10497
Plaintiff:
Dennis Clark
Defendant:
Rap-Up, LLC, Revolt Media and TV, LLC, Getty Images (US), Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
