Cases 31 - 40 of 1,624
Woodhouse v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 23-7973
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, ESQ.
Defendant / Appellee:
META PLATFORMS, INC., ALPHABET INC., GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Mitcheson et al v. Mistylou Investments, LLC et al
as 7:2023cv01587
Plaintiff:
Jessica Hinton, Tiffany Gray, Kimberly Cozzens and others
Defendant:
Mistylou Investments, LLC doing business as Tobie's Gentlemen's Club and Brian Donald Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv15686
Plaintiff:
RHEON GIBSON and TROY CENTRAL CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT 30C
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Derrick GibsonIn re: Derrick Gibson
as 23-1981
Petitioner:
In re: DERRICK J. GIBSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gibson et al v. National Association of Realtors et al
as MOW/4:23-CV-00788
Plaintiff:
Gibson
Defendant:
National Association of Realtors
Gibson et al v. National Association of Realtors et al
as 4:2023cv00788
Plaintiff:
Don Gibson, Lauren Criss and John Meiners
Defendant:
National Association of Realtors, Compass, Inc., eXp World Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
USA v. Gibson
as 23-11041
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Rodney Gibson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
GIBSON et al v. STROUD et al
as 1:2023cv00814
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LEON GIBSON and MICHELLE P. GIBSON
Defendant:
CHIEF TRAVIS STROUD, OFFICER DEVON WILLIAMSON, LIEUTENANT BRENT J. MACFARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
