Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Gilroy v. Emerson
as 3:2026cv01697
Plaintiff:
Daniel John Gilroy
Defendant:
Bradley David Emerson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2721 Driver's Privacy Protection Act
Gilroy et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 1:2026cv02374
Plaintiff:
Patrick Gilroy and J18 Enterprises, LLC doing business as Transformation Exteriors and Construction
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Smith v. D'Agostino
as 26-1404
Defendant:
STEVEN G. JAMES, MAE A. D'AGOSTINO, JOSEPH F. BIANCO and others
Plaintiff:
ETHAN DAVIS SMITH, - and JENNIFER L. DEES, -
Bray Murray v. Collen McCoy, et al
as 26-2112
Plaintiff:
BRAY JABRIL MURRAY
Defendant:
COLLEN MCCOY, JASEN BOHINSKI, COOPER and others
Smith v. D'Agostino
as 26-1265
Defendant:
MAE A. D'AGOSTINO, JOSEPH F. BIANCO, WILLIAM J. NARDINI and others
Plaintiff:
ETHAN DAVIS SMITH, - and JENI DEES, -
Gilroy v. Leeper et al
as 3:2026cv00503
Plaintiff:
Daniel John Gilroy
Defendant:
Sheriff Bill Leeper, Robert Jackson, Brandon L Schmidt and others
Pretrial Service:
Michael I. Coulson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Gilroy v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2026cv00328
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals America Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Gilroy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Maldonado v. Gilroy
as 3:2025cv02237
Plaintiff:
Jullian Maldonado
Defendant:
Jeff Gilroy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025cv07858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
