Cases 1 - 10 of 239
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Thomas v. Maryland et al
as 8:2024cv00980
Plaintiff:
Angela Ivey Thomas
Defendant:
Maryland, Gladys M. Weatherspoon, Thomas W. Hodge and others
Gladis Carrillo v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2035
Petitioner:
GLADIS AMINDA CARRILLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Greenspahn v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
Gladis Greenspahn
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Gladis Amaya-Diaz v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1241
Petitioner:
GLADIS MERCEDES AMAYA-DIAZ and E.J.A.D.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Pierce v. Rogelio Arreguin et al
as 2:2022cv04390
Plaintiff:
Gladys Nicole Pierce
Defendant:
Rogelio Arreguin and Bentwood Farms, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
MURPHY et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00971
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN MURPHY, AKEYA SIMPKINS, ALAN YOUNG and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., TITLEMAX OF GEORGIA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Blount v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Gladys Blount
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Woodhouse v. City of Virginia Beach et al
as 2:2022cv00328
Plaintiff:
Ashley Dallas Woodhouse
Defendant:
City of Virginia Beach, Eric Woodhouse, Fredrick McPherson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
St. Clair v. Office of Child Support et al
as 8:2022cv01464
Plaintiff:
Gregory St. Clair
Defendant:
Office of Child Support, Director Jo-Ella Brooks, Christopher Kunz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
