Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05650
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Gladys Rodriguez-Ventura v. Attorney General United States
as 19-3758
Petitioner:
GLADYS RODRIGUEZ-VENTURA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
RODRIGUEZ v. FEDOROWICZ et al
as 2:2019cv18061
Plaintiff:
GLADYS RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
RAIMUND FEDOROWICZ and DANIELA FEDOROWICZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. Sanofi US Services Inc. f/k/a Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv16708
Plaintiff:
Gladys Rodriguez
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc. f/k/a Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sandoz, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Northfield Insurance Company v. SOHO Experiential, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv21282
Plaintiff:
Northfield Insurance Company
Defendant:
SOHO Experiential, LLC , Gladys Rodriguez and Jose Juan Rodriguez Ledezma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Rodriguez v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv12400
Plaintiff:
Gladys Rodriguez
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company II v. Rodriguez-Casiano et al
as 3:2016cv01254
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company II
Defendant:
Gladys Rodriguez-Casiano, Glenda Molina-Rodriguez, Pedro Angel Molina-Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv05669
Plaintiff:
Gladys Rodriguez
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00430
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
