Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Anderson v. McMillian et al
as 5:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
FNU McMillian, Eric Dye, Jeffrey Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Cook v. Surry County Sheriff's Office
as 24-6194
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DAVID COOK
Defendant:
SURRY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, OFFICER GOINS, Sheriff, OFFICER ETHAN EVANS, Sheriff and others
COOK v. SURRY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DAVID COOK
Defendant:
SURRY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, OFFICER GOINS and ETHAN EVANS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goins v. USA
as 3:2024cv00121
Petitioner:
Shamon Monair Goins
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Goines v. Yes Care Corporation
as 1:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Derrell L. Goines
Defendant:
Yes Care Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
COOK v. SURY COUNTY SHERRIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 1:2023cv01109
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DAVID COOK
Defendant:
SURY COUNTY SHERRIFF'S OFFICE, OFFICER GOINS, OFFICER ETHAN EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goins v. Jenkins
as 5:2023cv04933
Plaintiff:
Sean Goins
Defendant:
Sergeant Jenkins and Lexington County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
David Meyers v. Mr. Honeycut
as 23-6931
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. HONEYCUTT, Alexander Correctional Institute Warden, FARRISH, Unit Manager, TIMOTHY METCALF and others
Meyers v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Mr. FNU Honeycutt, FNU Farrish, Timothy Metcalf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Duncan et al
as 5:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Jeffrey P. Duncan, FNU Freeman, Joshua Sigmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
