Cases 1 - 10 of 95
United States v. Loren Goodlow
as 24-1851
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Loren Goodlow
Goodlow, Jr. v. JLM Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Joseph Goodlow, Jr.
Defendant:
JLM Transportation, Inc., Watford Insurance Company and Colton Michael Boykin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Goodlow v. JLM Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Joseph Goodlow, Jr.
Defendant:
JLM Transportation, Inc., Colton Michael Boykin, Watford Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
ROBINSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01395
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE GOODLOW ROBINSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Goodlow v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10127
Plaintiff:
Angela Goodlow
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hickson v. Durant, City of et al
as 6:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
Dejuan Hickson
Defendant:
Durant, City of, Thomas Billy, Ricky Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
(PC) Goodlow v. Gomez
as 1:2023cv00662
Plaintiff:
Ivan Goodlow
Defendant:
A. Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ivan Goodlow v. James Hill
as 2:2023cv01918
Petitioner:
Ivan Goodlow
Respondent:
James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goodlow v. Gateway First Bank, successor by conversion to Gateway Mortgage Group, LLC
as 5:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
Jazmyne Goodlow and Jazmyne Ross
Defendant:
Gateway First Bank, successor by conversion to Gateway Mortgage Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
