Cases 1 - 10 of 80
United States of America v. Pulliam (Scott)
as 25-3149
Defendant:
GABRIEL PULLIAM, TAHJAY LOVE, ZAEKWON MCDANIEL and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Pulliam
as 25-2913
Defendant:
TAHJAY LOVE, ZAEKWON MCDANIEL, EZRA ALVES and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Pulliam (Love)
as 25-2492
Defendant:
GABRIEL PULLIAM, ZAEKWON MCDANIEL, EZRA ALVES and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rutan & Tucker, LLP, et al v. Arctic Cat Sales, et al
as 25-2987
Plaintiff:
Speed RMG Partners, LLC, Robby Gordon and Todd Romano
Appellant:
Rutan & Tucker, LLP, Steven A. Nichols and Steven J. Goon
Defendant:
Arctic Cat Sales, Inc., Arctic Cat, Inc., Textron Specialized Vehicles, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Bradley A. Chapin and Lucas K. Hori
United States of America v. Pulliam (Bayon)
as 25-2386
Defendant:
GABRIEL PULLIAM, TAHJAY LOVE, ZAEKWON MCDANIEL and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Pulliam (McDaniel)
as 25-2267
Defendant:
GABRIEL PULLIAM, TAHJAY LOVE, EZRA ALVES and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Fitzgerald et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv11814
Plaintiff:
Lisa Maria Harter, Martin Fitzgerald, Scott Floria and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Dupont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corp Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
United States of America v. Pulliam (Graham)
as 25-1221
Defendant:
JAMES GRAHAM, GABRIEL PULLIAM, EZRA ALVES and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Pulliam (Cabrera)
as 25-1055
Defendant:
JUSTIN CABRERA, GABRIEL PULLIAM, TAHJAY LOVE and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Goon v. Ottawa County et al.
as 3:2025cv00162
Plaintiff:
Derrik Lee Goon
Defendant:
Ottawa County, Stephen J. Levorchick and Mark Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
