Cases 31 - 40 of 158
Mays v. Grady County Law Enforcement Center et al
as 5:2021cv00992
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Defendant:
Grady County Law Enforcement Center, Sergent Nye, Sgt Sheldon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heger v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2021cv00985
Plaintiff:
Jarad Mikel Heger
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of and Grady County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Grady County Law Enforcement Center et al
as 4:2021cv00422
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Defendant:
Grady County Law Enforcement Center, Sergent Nye, Sgt Sheldon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Grady County Jail
as 5:2021cv00877
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Defendant:
Grady County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Grady County Jail
as 4:2021cv00360
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Defendant:
Grady County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00797
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graff, et al v. Aberdeen Enterprizes, II, et al
as 21-5031
Defendant / Appellee:
RODNEY DERRYBERRY, Sheriff of LeFlore County, ABERDEEN ENTERPRIZES, II, INC., ADAM WOODRUFF, Sheriff of Latimer County and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IRA LEE WILKINS, LINDA MEACHUM, DAVID SMITH and others
Defendant:
P.D. TAYLOR, Sheriff of Oklahoma County
HALL v. SOUTHERN CORRECTIONAL MEDICINE LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00054
Defendant:
GRADY COUNTY GEORGIA, SOUTHERN CORRECTIONAL MEDICINE LLC and HARRY YOUNG
Plaintiff:
DONTE HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. LNU
as 5:2021cv00052
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Johnson
Defendant:
FNU LNU, Madison County of, Grady County Law Enforcement Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. Grady County Jail Staff et al
as 5:2020cv01254
Plaintiff:
Donte Earl Griffin
Defendant:
Grady County Jail Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
