Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 9,824
Green v. Huffman
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff: Kelvin Green
Defendant: Brand Huffman
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MAJOR v. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00664
Plaintiff: JOHN R MAJOR
Defendant: PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SCI GREENE MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Greene v. David Ballard
as 24-6407
Plaintiff: MICHAEL JERMAINE GREENE
Defendant: DAVID BALLARD, Warden, JONATHAN FRAME, AWS, ANDY MITCHELL and others
Richardson v. Green
as 4:2024cv04079
Petitioner: Jim L. Richardson
Respondent: Brittany Green
Not Yet Classified: Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Ahnbrster et al
as 1:2024cv03267
Plaintiff: Darnell Green
Defendant: T. Ahnbrster, Officer Reed, Officer Daddezio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Ross v. Brittany Greene, et al
as 24-1728
Plaintiff: ROBERT ROSS
Defendant: BRITTANY GREENE, Warden and KATHY ASHCRAFT
Ballance v. Illinois Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv03100
Plaintiff: Kevas Ballance
Defendant: Illinois Department of Correction, J.B. Pritzker, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brunson v. Green et al
as 5:2024cv00541
Plaintiff: Albert Brunson
Defendant: Green, Howell and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Warden, USP Canaan
as 1:2024cv00720
Petitioner: Reginald Edward Green
Respondent: Warden USP Canaan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s
Raymond McElroy v. Jonah Beadles, et al
as 24-1865
Plaintiff: Raymond McElroy
Defendant: Jonah Beadles, Deputy Sheriff, Greene County Jail and James Arnott, Sheriff, Greene County Jail

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?