Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Randy Dingle v. Benjamin Khan
as 23-1329
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDY DINGLE
Defendant / Appellee:
BENJAMIN KHAN, Judge, TIMOTHY J. PETERKIN, Attorney, RICHARD MARTIN HUTSON, II, Trustee and others
Monosson et al v. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv07522
Defendant:
Ian Craig, Kenneth Hvid, Ingvild Saether and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Whiting and Steven A. Monosson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
J. Deal Partnership I, L.P. et al v. Teekay Offshore Partners, L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv06483
Defendant:
Ian Craig, Kenneth Hvid, Brookfield Business Partners, L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Aquamarine Master Fund L.P., Noster Capital Master Fund and J. Deal Partnership I, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morrison et al v. City of Carrollton et al
as 3:2019cv01164
Plaintiff:
Susan Morrison and Greg Morrison
Defendant:
Christapher Cruz, Cornelius Buckley, Hector Guzman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dingle v. Khan et al
as 5:2019cv00129
Defendant:
Patricia Ellen Watson Dingle, Allen Kerr, Joseph N. Calloway and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Dingle
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Karl Adams, et al v. ActionLink
as 13-3265
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Beauford, Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Steve Cox, Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Elaina Grauer, Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ActionLink, LLC
Claimant - Appellant:
Karl Adams, III, Donny Banerjee, Michael Breeding and others
Morrison et al v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00020
Plaintiff:
Greg Morrison , Daniel Heath Morrison and Lacey Morrison
Defendant:
Owens-Illinois, Inc. , Crane Company and John Doe Defendants 1-500
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Engleman v. Cumberland County, et al
as 5:2012cv00147
Plaintiff:
Cheryl L. Engleman
Defendant:
Cumberland County , George Franks , Earl R. Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
