Cases 21 - 30 of 309
HubFul Venture Consulting et al v. NTS Communications, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
HubFul Venture Consulting and Gregory Allen Fisher
Defendant:
NTS Communications, LLC doing business as Vexus Fiber, LLC, Jim Gleason and Vexus Fiber, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bonnie v. Dunbar
as 4:2023cv01215
Petitioner:
Gregory Allen Bonnie
Respondent:
Warden Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Allen v. Edmonds
as 7:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen
Defendant:
Larry T. Edmonds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Artis v. Siemens Energy, Inc., et al.
as 2:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Amber Artis
Defendant:
Gregory Allen, Siemens Energy Inc, Esis Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
LATHEM v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04273
Plaintiff:
GREGORY ALLEN LATHEM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Artis v. Siemens Energy, Inc., et al.
as 2:2023cv00618
Plaintiff:
Amber Artis
Defendant:
siemens energy inc, esis, inc., Travelers Property Casualty Company of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
POLLACK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv03225
Plaintiff:
GREGORY ALLEN POLLACK, III
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bonnie v. Dunbar
as 4:2023cv00158
Petitioner:
Gregory Allen Bonnie
Respondent:
Warden Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Claybon v. Dallas County District Attorney
as 22-11186
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gregory Allen Claybon
Defendant / Appellee:
Dallas County District Attorney
Allen v. Edmond et al
as 7:2022cv00651
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen
Defendant:
Larry T. Edmonds, Bland and Larry T. Edmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
