Cases 11 - 20 of 421
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
USA v. Gregory Richardson
as 22-13990
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GREGORY RICHARDSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Richardson et al v. Herrera et al
as 2:2022cv04370
Plaintiff:
Gregory Richardson and Terrance Sevalia
Defendant:
Mario Ernesto Herrera, Penske Truck Leasing, Co., L.P., TForce Freight, Inc. f/k/a U.P.S. Ground Freight, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02811
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02816
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Gregory Richardson v. The Commission on Judicial Performance al
as 5:2022cv01709
Petitioner:
Gregory Richardson and commission on judicial performance
Defendant:
The Commission on Judicial Performance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
