Cases 41 - 50 of 3,585
Moore (PS) v. Hodge
as 1:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Arthur Moore
Defendant:
Hodge, Marshall Griffith and Warden Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Arnett v. Griffis et al
as 7:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
William L Arnett
Defendant:
Mike Griffith, Officer Doe #1, Guard Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodarte (PS) v. Cox et al
as 1:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Adrian Rodarte
Defendant:
Larry Cox, Virgil Ensey, Virgina Cowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carvell v. Sterigenics, U.S., LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
James Carvell
Defendant:
Sterigenics, U.S., LLC, Sotera Health, LLC, GTCR, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Johnson v. Core Civic, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00021
Petitioner:
Kurk Johnson
Respondent:
Core Civic, Inc., Mark Knutson, Trabel Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Eugene Griffith et al v. Catlin Insurance Company et al
as 5:2024cv00394
Plaintiff:
Eugene Griffith and Julie Griffith
Defendant:
Catlin Insurance Company, Jessica Blais and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Insurance Contract
Griffith et al v. Catlin Insurance Company
as 5:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Eugene Griffith and Julie Griffith
Defendant:
Catlin Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Griffith-Sullivan v. Lumico Life Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv10075
Plaintiff:
Valerie Griffith-Sullivan
Defendant:
Lumico Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
